From: Influence of workshop attendance on management of pediatric fecal incontinence in Nigeria
Attended a workshop on fecal incontinence | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Variables | Attended No (%) | Not attended No (%) | Total No (%) | χ2 | p value |
Length of practice (years) | |||||
≤ 15 | 1 (9.1) | 20 (66.7) | 21 (51.2) | 10.679 | 0.001* |
> 15 | 10 (90.9) | 10 (33.3) | 20 (48.8) | ||
Stoma nurse/therapist available | |||||
Yes | 2 (18.2) | 1 (3.3) | 3 (7.3) | 2.617 | 0.106 |
No | 9 (81.8) | 29 (96.7) | 38 (92.7) | ||
Done MACE on patient(s) | |||||
Yes | 4 (36.4) | 3 (10.0) | 7 (17.1) | 3.951 | 0.047* |
No | 7 (63.6) | 27 (90.0) | 34 (82.9) | ||
Patients compliance with rectal enemas | |||||
Very compliant | 2 (18.2) | 2 (6.9) | 4 (10.0) | 1.020# | 0.600 |
Somewhat compliant | 7 (63.6) | 21 (72.4) | 28 (70.0) | ||
Poorly compliant | 2 (18.2) | 6 (20.7) | 8 (20.0)@ | ||
Cooperativeness of parents in administering rectal enemas | |||||
Very cooperative | 1 (9.1) | 3 (10.3) | 4 (10.0) | 0.063# | 0.969 |
Somewhat cooperative | 9 (81.8) | 24 (82.7) | 33 (82.5) | ||
Uncooperative | 1 (9.1) | 2 (6.9) | 3 (7.5)@ | ||
Scoring system used to evaluate patients with fecal incontinence | |||||
Yes | 5 (45.5) | 6 (20.0) | 11 (26.8) | 2.657 | 0.103 |
No | 6 (54.5) | 24 (80.0) | 30 (73.2) | ||
Digital radiograph to monitor treatment of fecal incontinence | |||||
Yes | 5 (45.5) | 7 (23.3) | 12 (29.3) | 1.903 | 0.168 |
No | 6 (54.5) | 23 (76.7) | 29 (70.7) | ||
Abdominal USS to monitor treatment of fecal incontinence | |||||
Yes | 2 (18.2) | 8 (26.7) | 10 (24.4) | 0.314 | 0.575 |
No | 9 (81.8) | 22 (73.3) | 31 (75.6) | ||
Stool chart to monitor treatment of fecal incontinence | |||||
Yes | 1 (9.1) | 8 (26.7) | 9 (22.0) | 1.451 | 0.228 |
No | 10 (90.9) | 22 (73.3) | 32 (78.0) | ||
Total | 11 (100.0) | 30 (100.0) | 41 (100.0) |