Skip to main content

Table 1 The clinical characteristics of all patients

From: Benign hepatic tumors in childhood: surgical resection and outcomes

Case N

aAge (m)

Gender

Presentation

Segments

PRETEXT

Tumor size (cm)

Diagnostic method

Pathological subtype

Extent of resection

Follow-up (m)

1

24

Female

Palpable mass

VI

I

7.2

Biopsy

FNH

Segmentectomy

88

2

24

Male

Palpable mass

V, VI

II

10.4

Imaging

FNH

Bisegmentectomy

80

3

17

Female

Palpable mass

V, VI, VII

II

15

Biopsy

MH

Segmental R

78

4

24

Female

Palpable mass

V, VI, VII, VIII

II

18

Biopsy

MH

Hemihepatectomy

71

5

10

Male

Abdominal pain

II, III, IV

II

12

Biopsy

Adenoma

Hemihepatectomy

68

6

72

Female

Palpable mass

III

I

7.5

Biopsy

Adenoma

Segmentectomy

60

7

84

Female

Palpable mass

II, III

I

11

Imaging

FNH

Left lateral S

53

8

11

Male

Abdominal pain

V, VI

II

13

Biopsy

MH

Bisegmentectomy

48

9

48

Female

Palpable mass

IVb, V

II

13

Biopsy

MH

Segmental R

43

10

60

Male

Palpable mass

V, VI, VII, VIII

II

18

Imaging

IHH

Hemihepatectomy

37

11

48

Male

Palpable mass

III

I

9.4

Imaging

FNH

Segmentectomy

33

12

5

Female

Palpable mass

VI

I

7.5

Biopsy

FNH

Segmentectomy

31

13

72

Female

Palpable mass

III

I

10.8

Biopsy

FNH

Segmentectomy

27

14

24

Male

Palpable mass

V, VI, VII, VIII

II

13.6

Imaging

MH

Hemihepatectomy

23

15

24

Female

Abdominal pain

V

II

10

Biopsy

FNH

Segmentectomy

18

16

108

Male

Abdominal pain

VI, VII

I

10

Biopsy

MH

Right posterior S

12

17

24

Male

Palpable mass

V, VI, VII, VIII

II

11

Imaging

FNH

Hemihepatectomy

10

18

24

Female

Palpable mass

II, III, IV

II

8

Biopsy

FNH

Hemihepatectomy

9

  1. m, months; MH, mesenchymal hamartoma; FNH, focal nodular hyperplasia; IHH, infantile hemangioendothelioma; R, resection; S, sectionectomy
  2. aThe patients were arranged by a chronological manner regarding the time of presentation