Laparoscopic management of persistent gastrocutaneous fistula after feeding gastrostomy appliance removal in children

Abstract

Background

Feeding gastrostomy is widely used in children that have troubles of swallowing and need to stablish enteral feeding. There are several methods for creation of that stoma. After the children gain their normal ability of swallowing, this tube or appliance is removed. Failure of spontaneous closure of gastrostomy opening after removal of the tube was reported with an incidence of 0.5 to 3.9%. The purpose of authors was to study laparoscopic management of persistent gastrocutaneous fistula after failure of conservative measures.

Results

There were 19 patients, 12 males. Main cause for feeding gastrostomy was neurological. Most feeding gastrostomy tubes were inserted endoscopically. The mean operative time was 57 ± 10.2 min. The mean time of full oral intake was 24 ± 3.5 h. No wound infection had developed. There was no recurrence of fistula after management.

Conclusion

Laparoscopic management of persistent gastrocutaneous fistula is safe, feasible, and associated with no recurrence of fistula.

Background

There is a wide range of indications for feeding gastrostomy in children. Several techniques are used to insert feeding gastrostomy tubes either surgical or endoscopic [1].

Creation of a stoma for enteral feeding is not free of complications. The incidence of these complications ranges from 2 to 60%. One of these complications is failure of spontaneous closure of gastrostomy opening after removal of tube with an incidence of 0.5 to 3.9% [2, 3].

It is expected that spontaneous closure of gastrocutaneous fistula opening takes place within 1 to 3 months after removal of tube or gastric button [4].

Authors evaluated laparoscopic management of persistent gastrocutaneous fistula after failure of conservative measures.

Methods

The study was carried out on infants and children that suffered from persistent gastrocutaneous fistula after feeding gastrostomy tube removal. It included 19 children. All of them failed to have spontaneous closure or failed nonsurgical management (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1

Persistent gastrocutaneous fistula

Laparoscopic intervention was planned. Three ports were used: a telescope, (30°) 5 mm, was passed through the umbilical port, and two ports were inserted at both midclavicular lines above level of umbilicus. Exploration of peritoneal cavity was the first step (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2

Exploration and examination of fistula track

Any collection related to the fistula was cleared out. Separation of the stomach from the anterior abdominal wall was the second step (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3

Separation of the stomach from the anterior abdominal wall

Trimming of the edges of the stoma on the anterior wall of the stomach was done. If the resultant defect was small, it was hand sewn (Fig. 4).

Fig. 4

Hand-sewn defect after trimming

A linear endoscopic stapler was used to close the gastric defect in some cases (Fig. 5).

Fig. 5

Large defect managed using a straight endoscopic stapler

Peritoneal irrigation was performed. Cauterization of interior part of the anterior abdominal wall at the site of fistula was done. External curettage of the fistula site on the anterior abdominal wall was performed. Wounds were closed. According to our protocol of initialization of oral intake following laparoscopic interventions, patients started oral intake 4 h postoperatively. They continued oral intake as they tolerated till they reached full oral intake.

Results

Preoperative and demographic data

The study included 19 children with persistent gastrocutaneous fistula that failed to close either spontaneously or with other conservative measures. The fistula was considered persistent if it did not close after 3 months of removal of the tube.

Indications for feeding gastrostomy insertion in these children are summarized in Table 1. There were 12 males and 7 females. Thirteen children had percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube, four children had conventional surgical insertion, and two cases had laparoscopic insertion of gastrostomy tube. The mean duration of gastrostomy tubes from insertion to closure was 1.7 years ± 0.5 years. The mean duration of nonoperative management was 3.5 ± 1.2 months. The mean age at operation was 5.4 years±4.2 years (Table 1).

Table 1 Demographic and preoperative data

Operative data

Collection related to fistula tract was found in 7 cases. In three cases, there was malpositioned one or more of fixing hocks of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube. These hocks passed through stoma to fistula tract and acted as foreign body. Other cases showed no detected abnormality.

The mean operative time was 57 min ± 10.2. No accidental hemorrhage or visceral injury was encountered. Endoscopic linear stapler was used in 3 cases. In the other 16 cases, stoma was closed with PDS or Vicryl size 3/0 sutures in continuous manner. No drain was used in all patients. The mean duration to full enteral feeding was 24 h ± 3.5 h. The mean hospital stay was 48 h ± 6.3 h. No recurrence or failure of management was recorded (Table 2).

Table 2 Operative and postoperative data

Discussion

There are different factors that contribute to persistent gastrocutaneous fistula in children after its removal. Age of patient at time of insertion, method of insertion, and duration of gastrostomy tube are most common factors related to failure of spontaneous closure [5].

There are several conservative measures that helped and promoted spontaneous closure. They included curettage of external opening of fistula track and then curettage by silver nitrate, improving gastric emptying, decreasing intragastric pressure, and reducing gastric acidity [6].

Some studies reported the use of tissue-sealing substances as collagen or cyanoacrylate with nonocclusive results. These approaches had the advantages that they did not require general anesthesia and can be performed as outpatient procedure [7].

Other studies demonstrated the use of endoscopic approach to close gastrocutaneous fistula. Several techniques were used with high success rate in some of them and some recurrences in others. These endoscopic techniques included cauterization, clipping, suturing, banding, and use of mesh and tissue glue. One of the advantages of endoscopic closure approach was that healing immediately occurred. The incidence of recurrence ranged from 0 to 35%. Disadvantage of these techniques included the high costs of used instruments [8,9,10].

Conventional surgical management of failed spontaneous closure of gastrocutaneous fistula remained the main line of treatment. The traditional approach depended on mini laparotomy, fistula track excision, and repair of the stomach in two layers [11].

Singhal and his colleagues described extraperitoneal excision of fistula track and closure of stoma as a procedure with minimal invasiveness. Their children stayed at a hospital for about 3 days. Oral intake was tolerated within 2 days postoperatively. The overall recurrence rate was 4.1% [10].

During current study, authors used laparoscopic technique to disconnect the stomach from the anterior abdominal wall and close stoma either by linear stapler or traditional sutures.

The main advantages of laparoscopic approach were detecting and dealing with any cause that might have led to failure of spontaneous closure and separation of gastric wall from the abdominal wall.

The mean hospital stay duration was 2 days, and infants and children started oral intake once tolerated with a mean duration of 24 h.

No recurrence occurred in the current study. Although endoscopic technique has its many advantages, its approach does not include separation of stomach from the abdominal wall. This may make circumstances suitable for recurrence after management. Also, another cause for recurrence after endoscopic intervention was the inability of clips used by some authors to completely enclose the stoma. These patients were treated by conventional surgical approach [12].

Conclusion

Laparoscopic closure of persistent gastrocutaneous fistula after removal of feeding gastrostomy tube is safe, effective, and more exploratory with no recurrence after management, and has a short hospital stay.